walnats

Nats-based event-driven background jobs and microservices framework.

Features:

  • Event-driven.

  • 100% type-safe.

  • Immutable and easy to test.

  • Explicit APIs, no magic.

  • Strict separation between publishers and subscribers.

  • Asyncio-based.

  • Nats-powered.

  • Exactly-once delivery.

  • Smart and configurable retries.

  • Many integrations.

  • Request/reply.

  • Periodic tasks.

  • Built-in linter.

  • Generator for AsyncAPI spec and EventSourcing diagrams.

  • CloudEvents support.

  • Extensive documentation.

  • Compatible. You can use walnats to emit events for non-walnats services or consume events emitted by non-walnats services. The tool is flexible enough to adapt to any format of the messages you use.

Read the documentation to get started.

Compared to other tools

Compared to other big Python frameworks for background jobs (like celery, dramatiq, rq, huey, and so on), the main difference from an implementation perspective is that walnats is younger and so had an opportunity to be designed around modern technologies right from the beginning. Namely, mypy-powered type safety, async/await-powered concurrency, and nats-powered persistency and distribution.

And when compared to all other Python frameworks for background jobs (including new async/await-based ones like arq, pytask-io, and aiotasks), the main difference is that Walnats is event-driven. While in all these frameworks the job scheduling is conceptually a function call over the network, in walnats publishers instead emit events to which any subscribers can subscribe at any point. This approach is called “tell, don’t ask”.

For example, when your webshop sends a parcel to a client, instead of directly calling send_email and send_sms actors like you’d do with Celery, with Walnats publisher will emit a single parcel-sent event, and that event will be delivered by Walnats to all interested actors. It gives you a few nice benefits:

  1. Publisher makes only one network request.

  2. When you add a new actor, you don’t need to modify the publisher. That’s especially cool for microservice architecture when the publisher and the actor can be different services owned by different teams.

  3. It’s easier to reason about. When you develop a microservice, you only need to know what events there are you can subscribe to and emit your own events without thinking too much about how all other services in the system work with these events.

  4. It’s easier to observe. Walnats directly translates events into Nats subjects and actors into Nats JetStream consumers. So, any Nats observability tool will give you great insights into what’s going on in your system.

If you have a big distributed system, Walnats is for you. If all you want is to send emails in the background from your Django monolith or a little hobby project, you might find another framework a better fit.

Lastly, compared to you just taking nats.py and writing your service from scratch, Walnats does a better job at handling failures, load spikes, and corner cases. Walnats is “designed for failure”. Distributed systems are hard, and you shouldn’t embark on this journey alone.

Installation

python3 -m pip install walnats

Basics

Dive deeper

References